Rigid and flexible constitution - SS1 Government Past Questions and Answers - page 1
Which type of constitution is difficult to amend or change?
Flexible constitution
Rigid constitution
Democratic constitution
Which of the following countries has a rigid constitution?
United Kingdom
New Zealand
United States
Which type of constitution allows for more fluidity and adaptability?
Flexible constitution
Written constitution
Democratic constitution
Which type of constitution allows for more fluidity and adaptability?
Flexible constitution
Written constitution
Democratic constitution
Which of the following countries has a flexible constitution?
Germany
France
United Kingdom
What is the main advantage of a rigid constitution?
Allows for more fluidity and adaptability
Provides stability and predictability
Better suited for a democratic society
What is a rigid constitution and what are its advantages and disadvantages?
A rigid constitution is one that is difficult to amend or change, and usually requires a complex and lengthy process. The main advantage of a rigid constitution is that it provides stability and predictability, as the rules and principles are not easily changed. However, a rigid constitution can also be difficult to adapt to changing circumstances, as the amendment process can be lengthy and complex.
What is a flexible constitution and what are its advantages and disadvantages?
A flexible constitution is one that can be easily amended or changed, usually only requiring a simple majority vote or an act of parliament. The main advantage of a flexible constitution is that it allows for more fluidity and adaptability, and can be changed more easily to meet the needs of society and respond to new challenges. However, this also means that the constitution may not provide as much stability and predictability as a rigid one.