Composition : Debates - SS1 English Past Questions and Answers - page 1

Good morning, everyone. I am here today to speak against the motion that education is not as important as riches.

I believe that education is the most important thing in life. It is the key to a better future, both for individuals and for society as a whole.

An educated person is more likely to be employed, to earn a higher income, and to live a healthier life. They are also more likely to be involved in their community and to make a positive contribution to society.

Riches, on the other hand, are not always a guarantee of happiness or success. In fact, there are many wealthy people who are unhappy and unfulfilled.

Money can buy you material possessions, but it cannot buy you happiness, health, or love. It cannot buy you knowledge, understanding, or wisdom.

Education, on the other hand, can give you all of these things and more. It can help you to understand the world around you, to make informed decisions, and to live a fulfilling life.

I urge you to vote against the motion that education is not as important as riches. Education is the key to a better future for all of us.

Thank you.

Here are some additional arguments in support of the importance of education:

Education can help people to develop their critical thinking skills, which are essential for making informed decisions in a complex world.

Education can help people to become more creative and innovative, which are essential for solving the challenges of the 21st century.

Education can help people to become more tolerant and understanding of others, which is essential for building a more peaceful and just world.

In conclusion, I believe that education is the most important thing in life. It is the key to a better future, both for individuals and for society as a whole. I urge you to vote against the motion that education is not as important as riches. Thank you.

Goodday, everyone. I am here today to speak against the motion that violent video games should be banned.

I believe that violent video games are not a cause of violence. In fact, there is no scientific evidence to support this claim.

Studies have shown that violent video games can actually have a positive impact on players. For example, they can help players to improve their hand-eye coordination and their problem-solving skills.

Violent video games can also be a way for players to express themselves and to explore different emotions. For example, a player might play a violent video game to work through anger or frustration.

Of course, there are some people who are more susceptible to the negative effects of violent video games. For example, people who are already violent or who have mental health problems might be more likely to be affected by violent video games.

However, this does not mean that violent video games should be banned for everyone. Instead, we should focus on helping people who are at risk of being affected by violent video games.

I urge you to vote against the motion that violent video games should be banned. Violent video games are not a cause of violence, and they can actually have a positive impact on players. Thank you.

Here are some additional arguments against banning violent video games:

Banning violent video games would be a violation of free speech.

Banning violent video games would not stop people from playing them.

There is no evidence that violent video games cause violence.

Violent video games can actually be a way for people to express themselves and to explore different emotions.

In conclusion, I believe that violent video games should not be banned. They are not a cause of violence, and they can actually have a positive impact on players. Thank you.