Question on: JAMB Government - 2024
The main argument against the 1999 Constitution is that
it was imposed by the military
the executive have immunity clause
It is expensive to operate
It did not create additional states
The main argument against the 1999 Constitution is that it was imposed by the military. The military drafted and implemented the constitution without adequate public consultation or participation, leading to concerns about its legitimacy and representativeness. The other options, while potentially valid criticisms, are not the primary or most significant argument against the constitution's creation.
Add your answer
Please share this, thanks!
No responses